Steve Bruzonsky - Arizona\'s get well, get on with life attorney Peer Review Rated Steve Bruzonsky - Arizona\'s get well, get on with life attorney






Steven J. Bruzonsky

Attorney At Law

Law Office of
Steven J. Bruzonsky
917 E. San Angelo Ave.
Gilbert, AZ 85234
480-969-3003

Call 480-969-3003

 

Please note that Attorney Bruzonsky has been doing this regular “Liens Corner” column since April 2006. His last “Liens Corner” article was for the November/December 2017 issue of The Advocate, having stepped down from this regular column, as he now works part-time (and is part-time retired) exclusively handling large subrogation/lien claims in very large personal injury and medical malpractice cases for other attorneys. However, attorney Bruzonsky may add notes to this website under the subject lien article headers from time to time. (Please keep in mind that this site contains general information for educational purposes only. It is not intended to provide legal advise, which can only come from a qualified attorney who is familiair with all the facts and circumstances of your specific case and relevant law.) 

 

 

2014-05/06: Update Medicare Advantage Liens

June 25th, 2016 12:08:48 pm


This article has been published in “The Advocate”, a monthly publication of the Arizona Association for Justice/Arizona Trial Lawyers Association, May – June 2014 issue, @2014 by Steven J. Bruzonsky, Esq.

 

 

May/June 2014 Lien Updates

 

 

Medicare Advantage Liens – Arizona Anti-Subrogation Case Law Preempted by Federal Law:

 

The Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One, in Estate of Ethridge Ex Rel. Pradia v. Recovery Management Systems, Inc., No. 1 CA-CV 12-0740 (Az. Ct. App. Feb. 13, 2014), recently held that “Part C of the Medicare Act and its associated regulations preempt Arizona’s anti-subrogation doctrine, and thus a Medicare Advantage plan may recover the medical expenses it paid for one of its enrollees from the settlement of personal injury claims asserted on behalf of the enrollee.” Division One remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. In this case, the injury settlement was $1.2 million, both for Wrongful Death, with two surviving daughters claiming their damages, and for violations of the APSA(Adult Protective Services Act), with the Estate of the deceased claiming damages including the deceased incident-related medical bills. The deceased’s Mercy Care Medicare Advantage Plan claimed a lien for  $348,166.20 incident-related medical benefits paid by the plan. Presently a Motion for Reconsideration is pending before Division One. And I would expect that either side will appeal to the Arizona Supreme Court an adverse ruling.

 

Medicare Advantage plans cite as authority for their lien claims 42 C.F.R. § 422.108(f), which provides that Medicare Advantage Organizations exercise “the same rights to recover from a primary plan, entity, or individual that the Secretary exercises under the MSP regulations.” Since it is mandatory that Medicare  liens be reduced to cover procurement costs (pro-rata attorney’s fees and costs), per 42 C.F.R. § 411.37, then if courts hold that state law anti-subrogation doctrine is preempted by federal law, the doesn’t the Medicare Advantage plan have to give at minimum the same procurement cost reduction that Medicare gives? In the Ethridge case, prior to litigation, the plan reduced the lien by 48% (the procurement cost percentage) to $181.046.43 without stating that the reduction was the mandatory Medicare Secondary Payer (MSP) procurement cost reduction. However, as the trial court held that the lien was invalid in its entirety, the issue of procurement cost reduction was never resolved at the trial court. Division One does not address the procurement cost lien reduction, apparently leaving this to be determined upon remand.



Return to Articles

© Copyright 2006, Steven J. Bruzonsky, Attorney
Terms of Use: This site contains general information for educational purposes only. It is not intended to provide legal advise, which can only come from a qualified attorney who is familiar with all the facts and circumstances of your specific case and relevant law. If you use this site, or send information or e-mail the attorney, such action does not create an attorney-client relationship. For legal advise please personally consult with an experienced attorney like Steven J. Bruzonsky.