Steve Bruzonsky - Arizona\'s get well, get on with life attorney Peer Review Rated Steve Bruzonsky - Arizona\'s get well, get on with life attorney






Steven J. Bruzonsky

Attorney At Law

Law Office of
Steven J. Bruzonsky
917 E. San Angelo Ave.
Gilbert, AZ 85234
480-969-3003

Call 480-969-3003

 

Please note that Attorney Bruzonsky has been doing this regular “Liens Corner” column since April 2006. His last “Liens Corner” article was for the November/December 2017 issue of The Advocate, having stepped down from this regular column, as he now works part-time (and is part-time retired) exclusively handling large subrogation/lien claims in very large personal injury and medical malpractice cases for other attorneys. However, attorney Bruzonsky may add notes to this website under the subject lien article headers from time to time. (Please keep in mind that this site contains general information for educational purposes only. It is not intended to provide legal advise, which can only come from a qualified attorney who is familiair with all the facts and circumstances of your specific case and relevant law.) 

 

 

2015-02: Arizona Anti-Subrogation Caselaw (AzTLA Annual Liens Seminar Handout)

June 25th, 2016 11:44:21 am


                                    LAW OFFICE OF STEVEN J BRUZONSKY

                                                               917 E. SAN ANGELO AVE.

                                                                     GILBERT, AZ 85234

                                                   480-969-3003    • Fax: 1-866-295-6635

 

 

“ER 1.15 Compliance Considering Recent FEHBA and Medicare Advantage Appellate Decisions”

 

February 6, 2015

Annual Liens Seminar 2015

Arizona Association For Justice/

Arizona Trial Lawyers Association

 

 

ARIZONA ANTI-SUBROGATION CASELAW:

 

[The following applies to all liens provided there is no federal preemption and/or no Arizona statutory provision which invalidate Arizona anti-subrogation caselaw.]

 

The common law rule long followed in Arizona is that, absent a statute, an assignment of a cause of action for personal injuries against a third party tortfeasor is void and unenforceable.

        

      Harleysville Mutual Ins. Co. v. Lea, 2 Ariz. App. 538, 542, 410 P.2d 495, 499 (1966) (Auto medical payments, Pensylvania insurance policy. The Arizona non-assignability rule "has much support in public policy.")

 

      State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. Knapp, 107 Ariz. 184, 185, 484 P.2d 180, 181 (1971) (Auto medical payments. Subrogation is prohibited under Arizona common law.).

 

      Allstate Ins. Co. v. Druke, 118 Ariz. 301, 304, 576 P.2d 489, 492 (1978) (Auto medical payments. "Whatever the form, whatever the label, whatever the theory, the result is the same.  The policies create an interest in any recovery against a third party for bodily injury.  Such an arrangement, if made or contracted for prior to settlement or judgment, is the legal equivalent of an assignment and therefore unenforceable.")  

 

Gallego v. Strickland, 121 Ariz. 160, 589 P.2d 34 (App. 1978) (Uninsured motorist claim, prior to statutory amendment providing for uninsured motorist subrogation);

 

      Hall v. Olague, 119 Ariz. 73, 75 n.2, 579 P.2d 577, 579 n.2 (App. 1978) ("In Arizona recompensation from the tort recovery by means of subrogation or refund of benefits is not permissible.").

 

     

 

Page 2

ARIZONA ANTI-SUBROGATION CASELAW

 

 

      Brockman v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 125 Ariz. 246, 248, 609 P.2d 61, 63 (1980) (New York group health insurance policy that had a reimbursement agreement between insurer and insured was void as against Arizona public policy.).

     

      Karp v. Speizer, 132 Ariz. 599, 601, 647 P.2d 1197, 1199 (App. 1982) (Assignment to judgement creditor by judgement debtor of proceeds expected to be recovered from personal injury action."We feel and therefore hold, that the better reasoned rule is that even though a cause of action for personal injury may survive, an action still may not be assignable either in whole or in part prior to judgment.").

 

      Talley v. Industrial Commission of Arizona, 137 Ariz. 343, 670 P.2d 741, 744 (App. 1983)

      (Subrogation for worker’s compensation is a statutory “limited exception” to the anti-subrogation rule. "Ordinarily, under Arizona law, an insurance company may not be assigned an injured insured's claim or [be] subrogated to the proceeds of such a claim.").

 

      American and Foreign Ins. Co. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 139 Ariz. 223, 226, 677 P.2d 1331, 1334 (App. 1983) (The "subrogation or assignment of a personal injury claim is void in Arizona.").

 

      State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Janssen, 154 Ariz. 386, 395, 742 P.2d 1372, 1381 (App. 1987) ("The common law of Arizona has held that subrogation or assignment of a personal injury claim is void.").

 

      Preferred Risk Mut. Ins. Co. v. Vargas, 157 Ariz. 17, 19, 754 P.2d 346, 348 (App. 1988) (Involving an Iowa insurance policy. "The Arizona Supreme Court has held that subrogation to another's rights in a personal injury claim amounts to assignment of the claim and is therefore void.").     

 

      Lo Piano v. Hunter, 173 Ariz. 172, 175, 840 P.2d 1037, 1040 (App. 1992) (Local school district health trust fund, prior to A.R.S. §12-962 establishing liens for local school districts. "The rule prohibiting assignment of a personal injury claim has been applied by the Arizona courts without exception in a variety of contexts.").

 

      Lingel v. Olbin, 198 Ariz. 249, 252, 8 P.3d 1163, 1166 (App. 2000) ("It is well established in Arizona . . . that, absent statutory authorization, an assignment of a cause of action for personal injuries against a third-party tortfeasor is void and unenforceable.").

 

      Premium Cigars International, Ltd. v. Farmer-Butler-Leavitt Ins. Agency,208 Ariz. 557, 564, 96 P.3d 555, 563 (App. 2004) ("Personal-injury . . . claims are not assignable.").

 

     Smith v. Arizona Long Term Care System,207 Ariz. 217, 222, 84 P.3d 482, 487 (App. 2004) (Personal injury settlement insurance proceeds cannot be "sold or assigned.").



Return to Articles

© Copyright 2006, Steven J. Bruzonsky, Attorney
Terms of Use: This site contains general information for educational purposes only. It is not intended to provide legal advise, which can only come from a qualified attorney who is familiar with all the facts and circumstances of your specific case and relevant law. If you use this site, or send information or e-mail the attorney, such action does not create an attorney-client relationship. For legal advise please personally consult with an experienced attorney like Steven J. Bruzonsky.