Steve Bruzonsky - Arizona\'s get well, get on with life attorney Peer Review Rated Steve Bruzonsky - Arizona\'s get well, get on with life attorney






Steven J. Bruzonsky

Attorney At Law

Law Office of
Steven J. Bruzonsky
917 E. San Angelo Ave.
Gilbert, AZ 85234
480-969-3003

Call 480-969-3003

 

Please note that Attorney Bruzonsky has been doing this regular “Liens Corner” column since April 2006. His last “Liens Corner” article was for the November/December 2017 issue of The Advocate, having stepped down from this regular column, as he now works part-time (and is part-time retired) exclusively handling large subrogation/lien claims in very large personal injury and medical malpractice cases for other attorneys. However, attorney Bruzonsky may add notes to this website under the subject lien article headers from time to time. (Please keep in mind that this site contains general information for educational purposes only. It is not intended to provide legal advise, which can only come from a qualified attorney who is familiair with all the facts and circumstances of your specific case and relevant law.) 

 

 

2016-07/08: The Winters Case: Abbott v. Banner Health Network: The Arizona Supreme Court Issues Its Decision in This AHCCCS Hospital Balance Billing Controversy

June 25th, 2016 11:51:23 am


This article has been published in “The Advocate”, a monthly publication of the Arizona Association for Justice/Arizona Trial Lawyers Association, July-August 2016 issue, @2016 by Steven J. Bruzonsky, Esq.

 

 

July/August 2016 Lien Updates

 

Abbott v. Banner Health Network– The Arizona Supreme Court Issues Its Decision in This AHCCCS Hospital Balance Billing Controversy:

 

This litigation originated in Maricopa  County Superior Court,Winters v. Banner Health Network, CV 2012-007665.  The subject of this litigation is the hospitals balance billing against personal injury and medical malpractice settlements for their unpaid charges over and above the contractual amounts paid by AHCCCS, pursuant to the healthcare provider lien statutes, A.R.S. §§33-931 to 934, and A.R.S. §36-2903.01(G)(4), which states that the hospital is allowed “to collect any unpaid portion of its bill from other third-party payers or in situations covered by title 33, chapter 7, article 3”. In this case, there are two classes of plaintiffs: (1) “Open-Lien Plaintiffs” – those with outstanding A.R.S. §33-931 hospital balance billing liens which had not been settled and for which a Lien Release had not been filed; and (2) “Closed-Lien Plaintiffs – those who had paid the hospital money and settled their hospital AHCCCS balance billing liens with the hospitals filing Lien Releases.

 

Judge Gama issued a Minute Entry, dated September 27, 2012, holding that the Closed-Lien Plaintiffs  had entered into an “accord and satisfaction”, that the settlements were final and binding, and that these claims were dismissed. Judge Gama issued  a Final Judgment, dated November 7, 2014, holding in regard to the Open-Lien Plaintiffs that the federal Medicaid statute and regulations, at 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(25)(C) and 42 C.F.R. §447.15, preempt all conflicting Arizona statutes, including A.R.S. §33-931 and §36-2903.01(G)(4); that such AHCCCS hospital balance billing liens are unlawful, void and unenforceable; and that the hospitals are permanently enjoined from filing or asserting such liens after having received any payment from AHCCCS for the patient’s care; that the hospitals are ordered to release and discharge all Open Liens on which the hospital has had contact with a patient, attorney or insurance carrier adjuster within ten calendar days of this Judgment; and that the hospitals are ordered to release and discharge all Open Liens within five calendar days of this Judgment after oral or written request; However, Judge Gama stated that the Court is not making a determination at this time whether the hospitals are required to bill AHCCCS where a patient is eligible or enrolled in the AHCCCS program.

 

In Abbott v. Banner Health Network, 341 P.3d 478, 236 Ariz. 436 (Ariz.App. 2014), Division One reversed and remanded in regard to the Closed-Lien Plaintiffs, holding that federal law preempts state law, which purports to allow AHCCCS hospital balance billing , and that "[s]ince the liens themselves are void under federal law, the accord and satisfaction agreements are also unenforceable."

 

On May 23, 2016, the Arizona Supreme Court published its decision in regard to the Closed-Lien Plaintiffs in Abbott v. Banner Health Network. In regard to the Closed-Lien Plaintiffs (the fifteen plaintiffs who had settled their hospital AHCCCS balance billing liens with the hospitals filing Lien Releases), the Court held that at the time of these accord and satisfaction agreements, there was a bona fide dispute concerning the enforceability of the liens, the settlement agreements were supported by adequate consideration, and therefore the agreements are valid and not void for illegality (reversing Division One, Arizona Court of Appeals, in this regard). The Arizona Supreme Court assumed without deciding that federal law preempts hospital AHCCCS balance billing  under A.R.S. §33-931 and A.R.S. §36-2903.01(G)(4). Therefore, the trial court’s injunction is still in force; and the case involving the Open-Lien Plaintiffs will now continue in the trial court, with anticipated further litigation concerning the legality of hospital AHCCCS balance billing and related issues.



Return to Articles

© Copyright 2006, Steven J. Bruzonsky, Attorney
Terms of Use: This site contains general information for educational purposes only. It is not intended to provide legal advise, which can only come from a qualified attorney who is familiar with all the facts and circumstances of your specific case and relevant law. If you use this site, or send information or e-mail the attorney, such action does not create an attorney-client relationship. For legal advise please personally consult with an experienced attorney like Steven J. Bruzonsky.